Natrolite | |Na2(H2O)2| [Al2Si3O10] | ||
Morphology: | Image courtesy of Olaf Medenbach |
||
Orthorhombic mm2 single crystals are pseudo-tetragonal prisms terminated by a pyramid sizes range from a few millimeters to several centimeters Common forms: {110} and {111} |
|||
Physical properties: | |||
Cleavage: {110}
perfect Hardness: 5.5 Density: 2.20 - 2.26 g/cm3 Luster: vitreous Streak: white |
|||
|
|||
Optical properties: | |||
Color: colorless
to gray, bluish, yellowish colorless in thin section Biaxial (+) α = 1.473 - 1.483, β = 1.476 - 1.486, γ = 1.485 - 1.496, δ = 0.012 2Vz = 58 - 73° X = a, Y = b, Z = c Dispersion: r < v, weak |
|||
Thin section view of natrolite in hydrothermal portion of the Coyote Peak alkalic, ultramafic diatreme, Humboldt County, California Crossed polars. Width of view, 5 mm. |
|||
Crystallography: | |||
Unit
cell: a = 18.2928 Å b = 18.6383 Å c = 6.5848 Å (Neuhoff et al., 2002) Z = 8 Space group: Fdd2 |
|||
Name: | |||
The earliest names for the natrolite group, which included natrolite, mesolite, scolecite, and thomsonite, was some form of fibrous zeolite, such as Faserzeolithe of A.G. Werner and mesotype of Haüy (1801). Klaproth (1803) proposed the name natrolite, referring to its composition, for the mineral from Hohentweil, Hegau, Bade-Württemberg, Germany. | |||
A tetragonal natrolite, first found at Ilimaussaq, Greenland (Krogh Andersen et al., 1969), was later named tetranatrolite by Chen and Chao (1980) for similar material from Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec, Canada. Gonnardite has a variable composition, both in the framework and in the channels. Both tetranatrolite and gonnardite have the natrolite framework, but are disordered. All known samples form a continuous compositional series from Na-rich tetranatrolite to gonnardite, which has as much as 35% of the Na replaced by Ca. In 1998 the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification voted to abandon (discredit) the mineral name tetranatrolite, and voted to retain gonnardite to apply to all compositions with the disordered natrolite structure. Paranatrolite was named by Chao (1980) for a form of natrolite with the composition |Na2(H2O)3| [Al2Si3O10]. It appears to be an overhydrated form of gonnardite, and has been assigned doubtful status (Coombs et al., 1997), based on their Rule 4, which does not recognize states of partial hydration or overhydration as sufficient grounds for separate zeolite species. | |||
Crystal structure: | |||
The structure of natrolite was postulated by Pauling (1930) and was soon confirmed by X‑ray diffraction methods (Taylor et al., 1933). Meier (1960) also confirmed the structure and refined the atomic positions. The framework of the natrolite and the other fibrous zeolites consist of linked T5O10 chains (NAT). In natrolite the chains have the composition Al2Si3O10, and where highly ordered, the repeat distance along the chain, the c-axis, is 6.6 Å. | |||
Because the T5O10 chain has four tetrahedra to link with other chains, the topological symmetry of the framework is tetragonal. In the case of the natrolite arrangement, each chain is translated by c/4, in order to avoid Al-O-Al linkages. This type of linkage of the chains, whether ordered or not, yields the topology of the natrolite framework. | |||
The space between four linked chains forms a channel parallel to the chain lengths. Bonding non-framework cations causes a partial collapse of the channel through rotation of about 24° of each chain. This reduces the crystal symmetry | |||
to the orthorhombic space group Fdd2 for natrolite. Because the chains are polar, and in the natrolite framework all chains are oriented in the same direction, the structure is non-centrosymmetric. This aspect of the structure explains the weak pyroelectric effect of natrolite with a single polar axis, the c-axis (Hey, 1932). | |||
In natrolite Na cations (yellow in the figure) are symmetrically located along a screw-diad in the center of each channel (see the bottom edge of the figure). Each cation is coordinated with four framework oxygen anions on one side of the oval shaped channel and to the oxygen of two water molecules (Artioli et al., 1984). The water molecules (blue) are located near the “window” between the two chains forming the flat side of the channel. The protons of the water molecules are each bonded to a framework oxygen, and the water oxygen is bonded to the Na cation. In contrast to many other zeolites the cations and water molecules are tightly held in fixed positions, which affect the cation exchange and dehydration energy. |
Following the discovery of tetragonal natrolite (Krogh Andersen et al., 1969), which was hypothesized to have a disordered framework (Pabst, 1971), the refinement of the structure of several other samples of natrolite showed them to be partially disordered (Alberti and Vezzalini, 1981). One way the degree of ordering is estimated uses the difference between the b and a unit cell dimensions. Natrolite with the highest degree of ordering (b - a) is 0.346 Å (Neuhoff et al., 2002) and is zero for tetragonal natrolite. Alberti et al. (1995) reviewed the ordering in thirteen refined crystal structures. Neuhoff et al. (2002) investigated 4 natrolite samples with 29Si and 27Al magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) spectroscopy, finding one sample (San Benito County, California, USA) that is perfectly ordered. | |
Lee et al. (2002) showed that at pressures of 0.8 to 1.5 GPa natrolite has an abrupt volume expansion of about 2.5% without altering the framework topology. The anomalous swelling is due to sorption of water from the pressure-transmission fluid giving rise to a "superhydrated" phase of natrolite. The approximate formula of this phase is Na2(H2O)4[Al2Si3O10], which contains hydrogen-bonded helical water nanotubes along the channels. | |